{
  "schema": "https://cyberdelic.space/schemas/tending-audit-v1.json",
  "audit_id": "TEND-2026-10-04-001",
  "run_type": "scheduled-governed-run",
  "started_at": "2026-10-04T07:13:11-07:00",
  "office_turns_completed_at": "2026-10-04T16:23:58Z",
  "automation": {"id": "daily-cyberdelic-tending", "triggered_at": "2026-10-04T14:13:11.388Z"},
  "repository": {"branch": "codex/tending-2026-10-04", "starting_commit": "f49db22ae54c4998ec0b5acebbb86fc3cb0dc282", "pull_request": "https://github.com/doctorillumination/cyberdelic-space/pull/56", "pull_request_state": "draft-validation-transaction", "publication_action": "validated-autonomous-no-op-audit"},
  "office_versions": {"cartographer": "0.1", "gardener": "0.1", "librarian": "0.1", "publication_authority": "1.1"},
  "inputs": {
    "inbox_items": 0,
    "declared_question": "How can a gathering reveal agreement without erasing important forms of disagreement, and without making consensus the measure of truth?",
    "internal_region": ["cyberdelic-os:fn-25", "cyberdelic-os:bn-005", "cyberdelic-os:i-003", "cyberdelic-os:a-004", "The Cyberdelic Kernel v1.0"],
    "external_region": ["external:polis"],
    "prior_audit": "living-relations/audits/2026-10-03-001.json",
    "private_correspondence_excluded": true
  },
  "cartographer": {
    "state": "no-op",
    "candidate_limit": 3,
    "candidates_created": [],
    "proposals_examined": ["REL-P-000001", "REL-P-000002"],
    "sources_checked": [
      {"source": "https://compdemocracy.org/polis/", "checked_at": "2026-10-04", "scope": "Primary public description of participant statements, response choices, statistical analysis, and adaptable survey participation"},
      {"source": "https://compdemocracy.org/", "checked_at": "2026-10-04", "scope": "Primary public project and Polis maintenance description"},
      {"source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/fn-s0-001/v000001.md", "checked_at": "2026-10-04", "scope": "Complete FN-25 section, Expeditions, Storms, and the Birth of Boroughs"}
    ],
    "source_facts": [
      {"claim": "The Polis documentation describes participant-written short statements, agree/disagree/pass responses, and statistical analysis of the resulting opinion data. It permits partial participation and participant-defined survey dimensions.", "source": "https://compdemocracy.org/polis/", "attribution": "Computational Democracy Project public Polis documentation", "checked_at": "2026-10-04"},
      {"claim": "The Computational Democracy Project identifies itself as the designer and maintainer of Polis and describes its public hosting and research resources.", "source": "https://compdemocracy.org/", "attribution": "Computational Democracy Project public homepage", "checked_at": "2026-10-04"},
      {"claim": "FN-25 allows collective inquiry to end without consensus and asks that private interaction contribute to durable public artifacts rather than public noise.", "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/fn-s0-001/v000001.md", "locator": "The storm does not necessarily end in consensus.; Private interaction should feed public artifact rather than public noise."}
    ],
    "inference": "The existing shared-inquiry proposal remains a useful, explicitly partial comparison. Statistical opinion mapping can reveal patterns of agreement, but is not equivalent to FN-25's provenance-bearing artifacts, alternatives, and unresolved questions. A duplicate proposal would not deepen this distinction.",
    "uncertainty": "Public product descriptions do not establish real-world efficacy or equivalence with Cyberdelic OS. Moderation, identity, data governance, and losses in clustered representations remain open. This check does not revalidate the original paper, repository license, or every historical external claim.",
    "attribution": "Public primary project documentation and exact public Cyberdelic OS publications only. No endorsement or collaboration is implied.",
    "source_fact_and_inference_separated": true,
    "source_conflict_found": false,
    "outward_search_performed": true,
    "external_contact_performed": false,
    "private_material_read": false,
    "no_proposal_reason": "The inbox is empty. Today's bounded primary-source review supports the already proposed Polis connection and establishes no new node or distinct edge. Original evidence dates and proposal history remain untouched."
  },
  "gardener": {
    "state": "no-op",
    "changes": [],
    "decisions": [
      {"kind": "retain-difference", "decision": "Keep the Polis relationship proposed and its consensus-versus-unresolved-inquiry distinction explicit. No evidence warrants stronger confidence, ratification, endorsement, or a lifecycle change."},
      {"kind": "preserve-source-boundaries", "decision": "Retain the existing cross-form distinctions: FN-25 imagines durable inquiry artifacts; the Kernel states constitutional commitments; BN-005 and I-003 bound office work; A-004 records a finite implementation, not the entire imagined system."},
      {"kind": "finite-attending", "decision": "Preserve all cumulative proposals and relationships and the existing three-item Attending arrangement. Do not create a dated public tending page for an unchanged relational field."}
    ],
    "evidence": [
      {"source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/fn-s0-001/v000001.md", "locator": "The storm does not necessarily end in consensus."},
      {"source": "content/f6e686a1a1884e924e350539ad686aaa0180f5c219048df8cf97e69101339aefi0/content.md", "locator": "to remain in relation without requiring consensus.; Machine intelligences hold offices, not omniscience"},
      {"source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/bn-005/v000001.md", "locator": "Scheduler transaction; Publication boundary"},
      {"source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/i-003/v000001.md", "locator": "Stillness is an output of the instrument."},
      {"source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/a-004/v000001.md", "locator": "Every result keeps its publication state visible so discovery does not collapse living revision into permanent inscription.; It does not simulate the whole CyberdelicOS."}
    ],
    "manifest_changed": false,
    "attending_arrangement_changed": false,
    "exact_publication_sources_changed": false,
    "decision_reason": "The selected summaries, themes, relation claims, and related-work paths retain the distinctions supported by exact sources. No drift or new evidential distinction was established in this bounded review."
  },
  "librarian": {
    "state": "no-op",
    "catalog_change_limit": 3,
    "cumulative_catalog_read": true,
    "records_examined": ["catalog:external:polis", "catalog:cyberdelic-os:fn-25", "catalog:cyberdelic-os:kernel-v1", "catalog:cyberdelic-os:bn-005", "catalog:cyberdelic-os:i-003", "catalog:cyberdelic-os:a-004"],
    "records_created": [],
    "records_revised": [],
    "records_removed": [],
    "catalog_count": 22,
    "outward_search_performed": false,
    "decisions": [{"kind": "preserve-useful-index", "decision": "The existing Polis entry already supplies plain-language response choices, open-ended feedback, opinion mapping, civic dialogue, and mutual understanding, linked to a visibly proposed FN-25 comparison. Preserve all 22 records and their last-tended dates rather than treating a successful recheck as a catalog revision."}],
    "decision_reason": "The Cartographer and Gardener outputs identify no missing distinction needing new search vocabulary or summary changes. No underlying work, proposal, or history is removed."
  },
  "files_changed": ["living-relations/audits/2026-10-04-001.json", "cyberdelic-space.zip"],
  "validation": {
    "state": "passed",
    "checks": [
      "57 JSON and 3 XML documents parse",
      "31 indexed exact sources match recorded SHA-256 values and byte lengths",
      "Five selected HTML source copies match exact downloadable Markdown bytes",
      "Local evidence locators in catalog, manifest, proposal queue, and current audit match their sources",
      "All 22 catalog records and catalog metadata remain unchanged from the starting commit",
      "2,871 local references across 138 HTML pages resolve; all 8 JavaScript files pass syntax checks",
      "Live Chrome checks at 320, 390, and 1280 pixel widths pass five ordinary-language Polis searches with model-proposed labels and a working proposal-page route",
      "Directory results remain bounded to six; an unmatched search returns zero; the default Library returns three works; Attending retains three items",
      "No horizontal overflow or uncaught page errors in Library, Polis proposal page, Living Relationships, or Attending; the 390-pixel screenshot was visually inspected",
      "Only the current audit and mirror change, and both paths match active governance",
      "Sorted 259-member mirror rebuilt twice with identical bytes and exact member contents"
    ],
    "retry_note": "The first browser pass completed at 320 pixels before a homepage navigation timeout. A complete rerun passed at all three widths. One retry launched from the wrong working directory selected an older Node runtime and did not execute tests; the project runtime succeeded. No site code or environment configuration was changed.",
    "scope_note": "UI checks use production because code, styles, catalog data, and pages are unchanged. The new audit and mirror require post-merge live verification."
  },
  "public_change": false,
  "proposed_public_change": false,
  "relational_field_changed": false,
  "run_state": "valid-no-op",
  "valid_no_op": true,
  "human_review_required": false,
  "note": "Only this audit and the deterministic mirror are published. No exact publication, catalog record, proposal, relation, lifecycle state, prior audit, or Attending item changes. Publication metadata records the pre-merge snapshot; GitHub records the subsequent merge and deployment."
}