{
  "schema": "https://cyberdelic.space/schemas/tending-audit-v1.json",
  "audit_id": "TEND-2026-09-26-001",
  "run_type": "scheduled-governed-run",
  "started_at": "2026-09-26T08:05:10-07:00",
  "completed_at": "2026-09-26T09:08:15-07:00",
  "repository": {
    "branch": "codex/tending-2026-09-26",
    "starting_commit": "de7f5ae9b6a59c6e898e34c234ec2796ae7127bb",
    "pull_request": null,
    "pull_request_state": "pending",
    "publication_action": "validated-for-autonomous-publication"
  },
  "automation": {
    "id": "daily-cyberdelic-tending",
    "name": "Daily Cyberdelic Tending",
    "status": "active",
    "schedule": "Daily at 7:00 AM America/Vancouver",
    "next_scheduled_run": "2026-09-27T07:00:00-07:00"
  },
  "office_versions": {
    "cartographer": "0.1",
    "gardener": "0.1",
    "librarian": "0.1",
    "publication_authority": "1.1"
  },
  "inputs": {
    "inbox_items": 0,
    "declared_question": "Can the finite Library's instrument, technical architecture, and working prototype become directly findable as a coherent three-part region without expanding the relational graph?",
    "internal_region": [
      {
        "id": "cyberdelic-os:bn-004",
        "title": "Building the Finite Library"
      },
      {
        "id": "cyberdelic-os:i-002",
        "title": "The Library Aperture"
      },
      {
        "id": "cyberdelic-os:a-004",
        "title": "The Finite Library Prototype"
      }
    ],
    "external_region": []
  },
  "cartographer": {
    "state": "no-op",
    "candidate_limit": 3,
    "candidates_created": [],
    "existing_relations_rechecked": [],
    "sources_checked": [
      {
        "title": "Building the Finite Library exact source",
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/bn-004/v000001.md",
        "source_kind": "exact-living-publication",
        "checked_at": "2026-09-26T08:05:10-07:00"
      },
      {
        "title": "The Library Aperture exact source",
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/i-002/v000001.md",
        "source_kind": "exact-living-publication",
        "checked_at": "2026-09-26T08:05:10-07:00"
      },
      {
        "title": "The Finite Library Prototype exact source",
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/a-004/v000001.md",
        "source_kind": "exact-living-publication",
        "checked_at": "2026-09-26T08:05:10-07:00"
      }
    ],
    "source_facts": [
      {
        "claim": "Builder Note BN-004 documents a finite homepage that begins with declared intention, ranks public metadata deterministically, returns exactly three works, stores selection in the URL fragment, and avoids behavioral profiling.",
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/bn-004/v000001.md",
        "locator": "The Finite Library begins with a reader's intention, composes three possible encounters, and then stops."
      },
      {
        "claim": "Instrument I-002 specifies a reusable pattern of three visible signals, three encounters from a shared catalog, and an intentional ending while refusing popularity, engagement optimization, and covert behavioral ranking.",
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/i-002/v000001.md",
        "locator": "The Library Aperture turns three chosen words into three possible encounters, then releases the reader."
      },
      {
        "claim": "Artifact A-004 records the deployed Cyberdelic.space front door as a browser-side finite library that keeps living and inscribed publication states visible and contains no account, analytics, popularity score, recommendation profile, or infinite scroll.",
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/a-004/v000001.md",
        "locator": "The Finite Library Prototype is the public front door of Cyberdelic.space: choose three words, receive three works, and stop."
      }
    ],
    "inference": "The three exact works already form a self-declared instrument, architecture, and artifact region. Their immediate gap is catalog findability rather than an absent external neighbour or a necessary new graph edge.",
    "uncertainty": "The catalog links are model-proposed placements. This run does not decide whether the same internal relations should later become manifest edges or receive human ratification.",
    "attribution": "All facts in this bounded inquiry come from exact public Cyberdelic OS sources. No private material or external source was read.",
    "source_fact_and_inference_separated": true,
    "source_conflict_found": false,
    "private_material_read": false,
    "external_contact_performed": false,
    "outward_search_performed": false,
    "no_proposal_reason": "The inbox is empty, the inquiry is fully internal, and the exact works already identify one another. External discovery or a new relation proposal would not repair the present findability gap."
  },
  "gardener": {
    "state": "no-op",
    "relations_considered": [
      "cyberdelic-os:bn-004 to cyberdelic-os:i-002",
      "cyberdelic-os:i-002 to cyberdelic-os:a-004",
      "cyberdelic-os:bn-004 to cyberdelic-os:a-004"
    ],
    "decisions": [
      {
        "kind": "source-continuity",
        "decision": "Keep the three works together in catalog metadata because every exact source names the other parts of the instrument, implementation, and artifact lineage."
      },
      {
        "kind": "manifest-restraint",
        "decision": "Do not add manifest edges during this bounded run. Direct findability can improve without claiming that the relational field itself changed."
      },
      {
        "kind": "finite-attending",
        "decision": "Leave the three-item Attending arrangement unchanged and do not create a dated tending page because no node, edge, rationale, lifecycle state, or public relational path changed."
      }
    ],
    "changes": [],
    "evidence": [
      {
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/bn-004/v000001.md",
        "locator": "Instrument I-002, *The Library Aperture*; Artifact A-004"
      },
      {
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/i-002/v000001.md",
        "locator": "Builder Note BN-004, *Building the Finite Library*; Artifact A-004"
      },
      {
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/a-004/v000001.md",
        "locator": "I-002, *The Library Aperture*"
      }
    ],
    "manifest_changed": false,
    "attending_arrangement_changed": false,
    "exact_publication_sources_changed": false,
    "decision_reason": "The three sources are mutually legible and internally consistent. Cataloging is sufficient for this run, so no relational metadata change is warranted."
  },
  "librarian": {
    "state": "three-records-created",
    "catalog_change_limit": 3,
    "records_examined": [
      "catalog:cyberdelic-os:bn-004",
      "catalog:cyberdelic-os:i-002",
      "catalog:cyberdelic-os:a-004"
    ],
    "records_created": [
      "catalog:cyberdelic-os:bn-004",
      "catalog:cyberdelic-os:i-002",
      "catalog:cyberdelic-os:a-004"
    ],
    "records_revised": [],
    "records_removed": [],
    "decisions": [
      {
        "kind": "builder-note-cataloging",
        "decision": "Create a source-grounded record for Building the Finite Library so searches for three-word discovery, deterministic ranking, URL-fragment sharing, ranking bias, privacy, or accessibility can reach the technical account."
      },
      {
        "kind": "instrument-cataloging",
        "decision": "Create a source-grounded record for The Library Aperture so searches for alternatives to infinite scroll, bounded algorithms, shared catalogs, or attention-preserving discovery can reach the reusable interaction pattern."
      },
      {
        "kind": "artifact-cataloging",
        "decision": "Create a source-grounded record for The Finite Library Prototype so searches for the Cyberdelic.space homepage, three-result discovery, privacy-preserving discovery, or living and inscribed works can reach the deployed artifact."
      }
    ],
    "search_terms_added": [
      "how the library homepage works",
      "three word discovery",
      "finite recommendations",
      "deterministic ranking",
      "URL fragment sharing",
      "alternative to infinite scroll",
      "humane recommendation design",
      "bounded algorithm",
      "non-personalized library",
      "Cyberdelic Space homepage",
      "three results",
      "privacy preserving discovery"
    ],
    "outward_search_performed": false,
    "catalog_count": 20,
    "decision_reason": "The three exact works contain distinct conceptual, technical, and experiential knowledge about the finite Library but were not directly searchable in the tended catalog. Three bounded records make that region legible without changing source publications or the relational manifest."
  },
  "files_changed": [
    "living-relations/catalog.json",
    "living-relations/audits/2026-09-26-001.json",
    "cyberdelic-space.zip"
  ],
  "validation": {
    "state": "passed",
    "checks": [
      "52 JSON documents parse",
      "3 XML documents parse",
      "31 indexed exact sources match recorded byte lengths and SHA-256 digests",
      "Every catalog, manifest, and current-audit evidence locator occurs literally in its cited source",
      "18 proposals, 20 catalog records, 12 manifest nodes, and 7 manifest edges pass uniqueness and required-field checks",
      "All 8 JavaScript files pass node --check",
      "All 2,871 local links and assets across 138 HTML pages resolve",
      "Attending remains finite at 3 items and no dated tending page was created",
      "At 390 by 844 pixels, the Library and Living Relationships pages have no horizontal overflow and retain the Psychedelic default appearance",
      "Library directory searches for URL fragment sharing, alternative to infinite scroll, and Cyberdelic Space homepage return the intended new records within the six-result bound",
      "Changed paths are limited to the permitted catalog, audit, and deterministic mirror paths",
      "The deterministic mirror was rebuilt twice from sorted paths with matching SHA-256 digests and exact archived bytes"
    ]
  },
  "unresolved_questions": [
    "Should a later Gardener run represent this instrument, implementation, and artifact lineage as explicit manifest edges?",
    "How should the catalog distinguish a source-declared related work from a ratified relational edge?"
  ],
  "public_change": true,
  "proposed_public_change": true,
  "run_state": "catalog-expansion",
  "valid_no_op": false,
  "human_review_required": false,
  "note": "Three exact internal works now have direct, source-grounded catalog records. The relational manifest, Attending, and public tending pages remain unchanged."
}
