{ "schema": "https://cyberdelic.space/schemas/tending-audit-v1.json", "audit_id": "TEND-2026-09-24-001", "run_type": "scheduled-governed-run", "started_at": "2026-09-24T07:10:56-07:00", "completed_at": "2026-09-24T07:35:55-07:00", "repository": { "branch": "codex/tending-2026-09-24", "starting_commit": "5f4626909ef339ae3add0bd740946b16da2fa4b6", "pull_request": "https://github.com/doctorillumination/cyberdelic-space/pull/49", "pull_request_state": "ready-auto-publication", "publication_action": "validated-autonomous-no-op-audit" }, "automation": { "id": "daily-cyberdelic-tending", "name": "Daily Cyberdelic Tending", "status": "active", "schedule": "Daily at 7:00 AM America/Vancouver", "next_scheduled_run": "2026-09-25T07:00:00-07:00" }, "office_versions": { "cartographer": "0.1", "gardener": "0.1", "librarian": "0.1", "publication_authority": "1.1" }, "inputs": { "inbox_items": 0, "declared_question": "Does the internal Dear Elsewhere continuity remain accurately placed across its Field Note, Instrument, Artifact, and Builder Note, or does any relation or catalog record require tending?", "internal_region": [ { "id": "cyberdelic-os:fn-35", "title": "A Place for the Reply" }, { "id": "cyberdelic-os:i-005", "title": "Dear Elsewhere" }, { "id": "cyberdelic-os:a-005", "title": "Dear Elsewhere" }, { "id": "cyberdelic-os:bn-006", "title": "Building Dear Elsewhere" } ], "external_region": [] }, "cartographer": { "state": "no-op", "candidate_limit": 3, "candidates_created": [], "existing_proposals_rechecked": [ "REL-P-000016", "REL-P-000017", "REL-P-000018" ], "sources_checked": [ { "title": "A Place for the Reply exact source", "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/fn-s0-008/v000001.md", "source_kind": "exact-living-publication", "checked_at": "2026-09-24T07:10:56-07:00" }, { "title": "Dear Elsewhere Instrument exact source", "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/i-005/v000001.md", "source_kind": "exact-living-publication", "checked_at": "2026-09-24T07:10:56-07:00" }, { "title": "Dear Elsewhere Artifact exact source", "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/a-005/v000001.md", "source_kind": "exact-living-publication", "checked_at": "2026-09-24T07:10:56-07:00" }, { "title": "Building Dear Elsewhere exact source", "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/bn-006/v000001.md", "source_kind": "exact-living-publication", "checked_at": "2026-09-24T07:10:56-07:00" } ], "source_facts": [ { "claim": "Field Note 35 develops Dear Elsewhere as a slow, finite correspondence in which distinct attentions alter one shared surface while earlier arrangements remain encounterable.", "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/fn-s0-008/v000001.md", "locator": "What the canvas holds; The speed of making, the time of answering; An ending that can still be encountered" }, { "claim": "Instrument I-005 specifies seven addressed arrivals, preserved earlier arrangements, explicit file handoff, a completed interactive relic, and a separate decision for any public life.", "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/i-005/v000001.md", "locator": "Pass the surface; Let seven be an ending; Choose what to carry onward" }, { "claim": "Artifact A-005 records a functioning browser and Mac prototype while explicitly withholding claims about durable shared hosting, verified identity, independent security review, or a completed interpersonal study.", "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/a-005/v000001.md", "locator": "The object that exists; What this record establishes" }, { "claim": "Builder Note BN-006 documents the shared runtime, seven snapshots, bounded included assets, turn-chain digests, portable exports, and remaining limits around identity, consent, recovery, conflicts, and public publication.", "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/bn-006/v000001.md", "locator": "One runtime in three places; Seven snapshots; Carry bytes, retain sources; What a commitment commits to; The portable relic and the context view; The next implementation threshold" } ], "inference": "The three existing implementation proposals still describe a legible internal continuity: the Field Note develops the encounter, the Instrument specifies conduct, the Artifact records the working embodiment, and the Builder Note makes its technical commitments and limits inspectable.", "uncertainty": "The continuity is strongly evidenced, but all three relationships remain model-proposed and emerging. The exact sources still identify a lived two-person exchange and shared-service reliability as open validation work.", "attribution": "All facts in this bounded inquiry come from exact public Cyberdelic OS sources. No private repository, private correspondence, or external source was read.", "source_fact_and_inference_separated": true, "source_conflict_found": false, "private_material_read": false, "external_contact_performed": false, "outward_search_performed": false, "no_proposal_reason": "The bounded internal continuity is already represented by three strong implementation proposals. No external search or additional candidate was needed, and adding one would expand the inquiry without evidence of a missing relation." }, "gardener": { "state": "no-op", "cartographer_proposals_considered": [ "REL-P-000016", "REL-P-000017", "REL-P-000018" ], "decisions": [ { "kind": "continuity-confirmation", "decision": "Keep the three implementation relations because their exact locators remain literal and continue to support the progression from encounter to protocol, working artifact, and technical account." }, { "kind": "lifecycle-restraint", "decision": "Keep all three relations emerging rather than active because the exact sources still identify a lived interpersonal exchange, reliable shared service, identity, recovery, and consent boundaries as open work." }, { "kind": "finite-attending", "decision": "Leave the three-item Attending arrangement unchanged and do not create a dated tending page because no node, edge, rationale, lifecycle state, or related-work path changed." } ], "changes": [], "evidence": [ { "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/i-005/v000001.md", "locator": "These are proposed observations. The present evidence comes from software checks and an illustrative study, not a completed interpersonal trial." }, { "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/bn-006/v000001.md", "locator": "Wider device testing, large personal archives, unavailable external sources, and a lived two-person exchange remain open validation work." } ], "manifest_changed": false, "attending_arrangement_changed": false, "exact_publication_sources_changed": false, "decision_reason": "The internal continuity remains accurate, and the emerging lifecycle still reflects the explicit validation limits. No relational metadata change is warranted." }, "librarian": { "state": "no-op", "catalog_change_limit": 3, "records_examined": [ "catalog:cyberdelic-os:fn-35", "catalog:cyberdelic-os:i-005", "catalog:cyberdelic-os:a-005", "catalog:cyberdelic-os:bn-006" ], "records_created": [], "records_revised": [], "records_removed": [], "decisions": [ { "kind": "catalog-evidence-confirmation", "decision": "Keep the four records because each summary, subject set, ordinary-language search vocabulary, question, related path, and evidence locator remains supported by its exact source." }, { "kind": "catalog-restraint", "decision": "Add no synonyms or questions because the current records already distinguish encounter, protocol, artifact, and technical account without duplicating one another." }, { "kind": "finite-search", "decision": "Keep directory results bounded to six and the default Library aperture at three works." } ], "search_terms_added": [], "outward_search_performed": false, "catalog_count": 15, "decision_reason": "All four records remain accurate and findable through distinct, source-grounded vocabularies. Revising dates alone would not materially improve findability." }, "files_changed": [ "living-relations/audits/2026-09-24-001.json", "cyberdelic-space.zip" ], "validation": { "state": "passed", "checks": [ { "check": "bounded-source-review", "result": "The exact Field Note, Instrument, Artifact, and Builder Note remain mutually consistent with the three existing Dear Elsewhere implementation proposals and their explicit limits." }, { "check": "structured-data", "result": "All 50 JSON documents and three XML documents parsed successfully." }, { "check": "exact-source-integrity", "result": "All 31 indexed Field, Workshop, and Library sources matched recorded byte lengths and SHA-256 values. Every catalog, proposal, and manifest evidence fragment occurs in its cited source." }, { "check": "internal-links", "result": "All 2,871 local links and assets resolved across 138 HTML pages." }, { "check": "application-and-data-contracts", "result": "All eight JavaScript files passed syntax checks. The 18 proposals, 15 catalog records, twelve relational nodes, seven edges, unique identifiers, required catalog fields, and finite limits passed contract checks." }, { "check": "responsive-browser", "result": "Living Relationships and the homepage directory rendered at 390 by 844 pixels with the psychedelic default, accessible links and search, and no horizontal overflow; document width equalled viewport width." }, { "check": "catalog-search", "result": "A homepage search for seven arrivals returned A Place for the Reply and the Dear Elsewhere Instrument as two results, within the six-result limit. The three-work default Library aperture remained unchanged." }, { "check": "finite-attending", "result": "The current Attending arrangement remained exactly three items and no dated tending page was created for this valid no-op." }, { "check": "changed-prose-policy", "result": "No em dash characters were added." }, { "check": "publication-boundary", "result": "Only the dated audit and deterministic mirror changed. No proposal, manifest, catalog record, exact publication, site page, application code, sitemap, ratification record, or human-locked control changed." }, { "check": "distribution-archive", "result": "The deterministic mirror was rebuilt twice with identical SHA-256 output, includes the dated audit, and matches every archived source byte for byte." } ] }, "unresolved_questions": [ "Will seven arrivals feel generous or abrupt in a lived correspondence?", "Which recovery and consent guarantees are necessary before manual file handoff becomes a shared service?" ], "public_change": false, "proposed_public_change": false, "run_state": "no-op", "valid_no_op": true, "human_review_required": false, "note": "The offices completed a bounded internal continuity audit without changing proposals, relationships, catalog records, Attending, or public tending pages. The audit record itself will be published through the governed merge path." }