{
  "schema": "https://cyberdelic.space/schemas/tending-audit-v1.json",
  "audit_id": "TEND-2026-09-23-001",
  "run_type": "scheduled-governed-run",
  "started_at": "2026-09-23T07:20:18-07:00",
  "completed_at": "2026-09-23T07:24:41-07:00",
  "repository": {
    "branch": "codex/tending-2026-09-23",
    "starting_commit": "2564fe4daf3f3736d8be5e6b56f887dcfda1e154",
    "pull_request": "https://github.com/doctorillumination/cyberdelic-space/pull/48",
    "pull_request_state": "ready-auto-publication",
    "publication_action": "validated-autonomous-evidence-locator-repair"
  },
  "automation": {
    "id": "daily-cyberdelic-tending",
    "name": "Daily Cyberdelic Tending",
    "status": "active",
    "schedule": "Daily at 7:00 AM America/Vancouver",
    "next_scheduled_run": "2026-09-24T07:00:00-07:00"
  },
  "office_versions": {
    "cartographer": "0.1",
    "gardener": "0.1",
    "librarian": "0.1",
    "publication_authority": "1.1"
  },
  "inputs": {
    "inbox_items": 0,
    "declared_question": "Does the proposed Polis adjacency remain supported by current primary sources, and can its public catalog evidence be followed to literal proposal records?",
    "internal_region": [
      {
        "id": "cyberdelic-os:fn-25",
        "title": "Expeditions, Storms, and the Birth of Boroughs"
      }
    ],
    "external_region": [
      {
        "id": "external:polis",
        "title": "Polis"
      }
    ]
  },
  "cartographer": {
    "state": "no-op",
    "candidate_limit": 3,
    "candidates_created": [],
    "existing_proposals_rechecked": [
      "REL-P-000001",
      "REL-P-000002"
    ],
    "sources_checked": [
      {
        "title": "The Computational Democracy Project",
        "url": "https://compdemocracy.org/",
        "source_kind": "official-project-site",
        "checked_at": "2026-09-23T07:20:18-07:00"
      },
      {
        "title": "Polis knowledge base",
        "url": "https://compdemocracy.org/polis/",
        "source_kind": "official-project-documentation",
        "checked_at": "2026-09-23T07:20:18-07:00"
      },
      {
        "title": "Polis public repository",
        "url": "https://github.com/compdemocracy/polis",
        "source_kind": "official-public-repository",
        "checked_at": "2026-09-23T07:20:18-07:00"
      },
      {
        "title": "Cyberdelic OS Living Field Notes exact source",
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/fn-s0-001/v000001.md",
        "source_kind": "exact-living-publication",
        "checked_at": "2026-09-23T07:20:18-07:00"
      }
    ],
    "source_facts": [
      {
        "claim": "The Computational Democracy Project continues to describe Polis as an open-source, real-time system for gathering, analyzing, and understanding what large groups think in their own words using statistics and machine learning.",
        "url": "https://compdemocracy.org/"
      },
      {
        "claim": "The current Polis documentation says participants submit short statements and respond to other statements with agree, disagree, or pass, while participants themselves create the dimensions of the inquiry.",
        "url": "https://compdemocracy.org/polis/"
      },
      {
        "claim": "The maintained public repository describes Polis as an AI-powered sentiment-gathering platform and identifies its public deployment and knowledge base.",
        "url": "https://github.com/compdemocracy/polis"
      },
      {
        "claim": "Field Note 25 imagines collective storms that may not end in consensus and may instead produce public artifacts preserving sources, disagreement, alternatives, ratification, and unresolved questions.",
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/fn-s0-001/v000001.md",
        "locator": "The storm does not necessarily end in consensus.; It may settle into a durable public artifact:"
      }
    ],
    "inference": "The existing Polis proposals remain a useful adjacency for large-group sensemaking. Polis maps participant statements and response patterns, while Field Note 25 imagines a wider public object carrying testimony, evidence, art, values, provenance, alternatives, and unresolved disagreement.",
    "uncertainty": "The relationship remains model-proposed. This comparison does not imply endorsement, partnership, methodological equivalence, or that an opinion map captures every form of difference.",
    "attribution": "External facts come from the official Computational Democracy Project site, Polis documentation, and maintained public repository. Internal facts come from the exact public Field Notes source.",
    "source_fact_and_inference_separated": true,
    "source_conflict_found": false,
    "private_material_read": false,
    "external_contact_performed": false,
    "outward_search_performed": true,
    "no_proposal_reason": "The bounded source recheck continued to support the existing node and edge proposals. A new candidate would duplicate the current proposal queue."
  },
  "gardener": {
    "state": "no-op",
    "cartographer_proposals_considered": [
      "REL-P-000001",
      "REL-P-000002"
    ],
    "decisions": [
      {
        "kind": "proposal-evidence-confirmation",
        "decision": "Keep REL-P-000002's Field Note 25 locator because the heading remains literal and the surrounding exact source still supports the internal claim."
      },
      {
        "kind": "proposal-restraint",
        "decision": "Leave descriptions, relation type, epistemic statuses, lifecycle, inference, and unresolved questions unchanged because current primary and exact internal sources still support their cautious boundaries."
      },
      {
        "kind": "finite-attending",
        "decision": "Leave the three-item Attending arrangement unchanged and do not create a dated tending page because no node, edge, rationale, lifecycle state, or related-work path changed."
      }
    ],
    "changes": [],
    "evidence": [
      {
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/fn-s0-001/v000001.md",
        "locator": "Expeditions, Storms, and the Birth of Boroughs"
      }
    ],
    "manifest_changed": false,
    "attending_arrangement_changed": false,
    "exact_publication_sources_changed": false,
    "decision_reason": "The existing proposal evidence and qualifications remain accurate. No relational metadata change is warranted."
  },
  "librarian": {
    "state": "one-record-revised",
    "catalog_change_limit": 3,
    "records_examined": [
      "catalog:external:polis"
    ],
    "records_created": [],
    "records_revised": [
      "catalog:external:polis"
    ],
    "records_removed": [],
    "decisions": [
      {
        "kind": "catalog-evidence-repair",
        "decision": "Replace the synthetic proposal conjunction with the two literal proposal identifiers present in the cited queue."
      },
      {
        "kind": "catalog-restraint",
        "decision": "Leave the summary, subjects, search terms, question, relation, and proposal state unchanged because current primary and exact internal sources support them."
      },
      {
        "kind": "finite-search",
        "decision": "Keep directory results bounded to six and the default Library aperture at three works."
      }
    ],
    "search_terms_added": [],
    "outward_search_performed": false,
    "catalog_count": 15,
    "decision_reason": "The record remained findable, but its evidence locator described a conjunction rather than quoting text present in the proposal queue. Literal identifiers restore auditability without expanding the catalog."
  },
  "files_changed": [
    "living-relations/catalog.json",
    "living-relations/audits/2026-09-23-001.json",
    "cyberdelic-space.zip"
  ],
  "validation": {
    "state": "passed",
    "checks": [
      {
        "check": "bounded-source-review",
        "result": "Current official Computational Democracy Project pages and the maintained Polis repository remain consistent with the existing proposed node, shared-inquiry edge, and explicit limits."
      },
      {
        "check": "structured-data",
        "result": "All 49 JSON documents and three XML documents parsed successfully."
      },
      {
        "check": "exact-source-integrity",
        "result": "All 31 indexed Field, Workshop, and Library sources matched recorded byte lengths and SHA-256 values. The repaired catalog locator and every evidence fragment on all seven manifest edges occur in their cited sources."
      },
      {
        "check": "internal-links",
        "result": "All 2,871 local links and assets resolved across 138 HTML pages."
      },
      {
        "check": "application-and-data-contracts",
        "result": "All eight JavaScript files passed syntax checks. The 18 proposals, 15 catalog records, twelve relational nodes, seven edges, unique identifiers, required catalog fields, and finite limits passed contract checks."
      },
      {
        "check": "responsive-browser",
        "result": "Living Relationships and the homepage directory rendered at 390 by 844 pixels with the psychedelic default, accessible links and search, and no horizontal overflow; document width equalled viewport width."
      },
      {
        "check": "catalog-search",
        "result": "A homepage search for opinion mapping returned the tended Polis neighbour and Field Note 25 as two results, within the six-result limit. The three-work default Library aperture remained unchanged."
      },
      {
        "check": "finite-attending",
        "result": "The current Attending arrangement remained exactly three items and no dated tending page was created for a catalog evidence-locator repair."
      },
      {
        "check": "changed-prose-policy",
        "result": "No em dash characters were added."
      },
      {
        "check": "publication-boundary",
        "result": "Only catalog metadata, the dated audit, and deterministic mirror changed. No proposal, manifest, exact publication, site page, application code, sitemap, ratification record, or human-locked control changed."
      },
      {
        "check": "distribution-archive",
        "result": "The deterministic mirror was rebuilt twice with identical SHA-256 output, includes the dated audit, and matches every archived source byte for byte."
      }
    ]
  },
  "unresolved_questions": [
    "How can a gathering reveal shared structure without making consensus the measure of truth?",
    "What must remain visible when complex positions are represented as clusters?"
  ],
  "public_change": true,
  "proposed_public_change": true,
  "run_state": "evidence-locator-repair",
  "valid_no_op": false,
  "human_review_required": false,
  "note": "One external-neighbour catalog locator now points to literal proposal identifiers. No proposal, manifest, public tending page, or Attending rotation was warranted because the relational field did not materially change."
}