{
  "schema": "https://cyberdelic.space/schemas/tending-audit-v1.json",
  "audit_id": "TEND-2026-09-17-001",
  "run_type": "scheduled-governed-run",
  "started_at": "2026-09-17T07:03:54-07:00",
  "completed_at": "2026-09-17T07:08:44-07:00",
  "repository": {
    "branch": "codex/tending-2026-09-17",
    "starting_commit": "c689608e96be99869032c1729a0be9077f4c4d43",
    "pull_request": "https://github.com/doctorillumination/cyberdelic-space/pull/42",
    "pull_request_state": "ready-auto-publication",
    "publication_action": "validated-autonomous-evidence-locator-repair"
  },
  "automation": {
    "id": "daily-cyberdelic-tending",
    "name": "Daily Cyberdelic Tending",
    "status": "active",
    "schedule": "Daily at 7:00 AM America/Vancouver",
    "next_scheduled_run": "2026-09-18T07:00:00-07:00"
  },
  "office_versions": {
    "cartographer": "0.1",
    "gardener": "0.1",
    "librarian": "0.1",
    "publication_authority": "1.1"
  },
  "inputs": {
    "inbox_items": 0,
    "declared_question": "Can the existing Polis and Community Notes proposals be followed to exact passages in Field Notes 14 and 25?",
    "internal_region": [
      {
        "id": "cyberdelic-os:fn-14",
        "title": "The Open Anatomy"
      },
      {
        "id": "cyberdelic-os:fn-25",
        "title": "Expeditions, Storms, and the Birth of Boroughs"
      }
    ],
    "external_region": [
      {
        "id": "external:polis",
        "title": "Polis"
      },
      {
        "id": "external:community-notes",
        "title": "Community Notes"
      }
    ]
  },
  "cartographer": {
    "state": "no-op",
    "candidate_limit": 3,
    "candidates_created": [],
    "existing_proposals_rechecked": [
      "REL-P-000002",
      "REL-P-000013",
      "REL-P-000014"
    ],
    "sources_checked": [
      {
        "title": "Polis public repository",
        "url": "https://github.com/compdemocracy/polis",
        "source_kind": "primary-public-source",
        "checked_at": "2026-09-17T07:03:54-07:00"
      },
      {
        "title": "Polis: Scaling Deliberation by Mapping High Dimensional Opinion Spaces",
        "url": "https://www.e-revistes.uji.es/index.php/recerca/article/view/5516/6558",
        "source_kind": "primary-research-source",
        "checked_at": "2026-09-17T07:03:54-07:00"
      },
      {
        "title": "Community Notes public repository and guide source",
        "url": "https://github.com/twitter/communitynotes",
        "source_kind": "primary-public-source",
        "checked_at": "2026-09-17T07:03:54-07:00"
      },
      {
        "title": "Field Notes 14 and 25 exact source",
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/fn-s0-001/v000001.md",
        "source_kind": "exact-living-publication",
        "checked_at": "2026-09-17T07:03:54-07:00"
      }
    ],
    "source_facts": [
      {
        "claim": "The Polis repository describes an open-source platform for large-scale, open-ended feedback and links its methods paper on mapping high-dimensional opinion spaces.",
        "url": "https://github.com/compdemocracy/polis"
      },
      {
        "claim": "The Community Notes repository publicly hosts program documentation and the open-source scoring implementation, and describes differing points of view as essential to helpful context.",
        "url": "https://github.com/twitter/communitynotes"
      },
      {
        "claim": "Field Note 14 names Community Notes as an open reference for cross-perspective helpfulness, while Field Note 25 imagines inquiry that may preserve explicit disagreement rather than end in consensus.",
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/fn-s0-001/v000001.md",
        "locator": "The Open Anatomy; Expeditions, Storms, and the Birth of Boroughs"
      }
    ],
    "inference": "The three existing proposed edges remain useful, bounded comparisons. Polis and Community Notes offer distinct methods for finding structure across disagreement, while the field notes imagine a broader system of provenance, values, testimony, and preserved dissent.",
    "uncertainty": "The proposals remain model-proposed and do not establish equivalence, endorsement, partnership, or a settled architectural choice.",
    "attribution": "External facts come from the projects' public repositories and linked primary research. Internal facts come from the exact public Cyberdelic OS source.",
    "source_fact_and_inference_separated": true,
    "source_conflict_found": false,
    "private_material_read": false,
    "external_contact_performed": false,
    "outward_search_performed": true,
    "no_proposal_reason": "The bounded source recheck supported the existing candidates and revealed no additional node or edge that would deepen this region."
  },
  "gardener": {
    "state": "three-evidence-repairs",
    "cartographer_proposals_considered": [
      "REL-P-000002",
      "REL-P-000013",
      "REL-P-000014"
    ],
    "decisions": [
      {
        "kind": "proposal-evidence-repair",
        "decision": "Replace REL-P-000002's combined field-note label with the exact FN-25 title that occurs in the cited source."
      },
      {
        "kind": "proposal-evidence-repair",
        "decision": "Replace REL-P-000013's combined field-note label with the exact FN-14 title that occurs in the cited source."
      },
      {
        "kind": "proposal-evidence-repair",
        "decision": "Replace REL-P-000014's combined field-note label with the exact FN-25 title that occurs in the cited source."
      },
      {
        "kind": "finite-attending",
        "decision": "Leave the three-item Attending arrangement unchanged and do not create a dated tending page because no node, edge, rationale, lifecycle state, or related-work path changed."
      }
    ],
    "changes": [
      "REL-P-000002",
      "REL-P-000013",
      "REL-P-000014"
    ],
    "evidence": [
      {
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/fn-s0-001/v000001.md",
        "locator": "The Open Anatomy"
      },
      {
        "source": "living-content/cyberdelic-os/fn-s0-001/v000001.md",
        "locator": "Expeditions, Storms, and the Birth of Boroughs"
      }
    ],
    "manifest_changed": false,
    "attending_arrangement_changed": false,
    "exact_publication_sources_changed": false,
    "decision_reason": "Three proposal evidence locators described headings in a synthetic form that did not occur as exact source text. Exact title fragments now make the same claims directly inspectable without changing their meaning."
  },
  "librarian": {
    "state": "two-records-revised",
    "catalog_change_limit": 3,
    "records_examined": [
      "catalog:cyberdelic-os:fn-14",
      "catalog:cyberdelic-os:fn-25"
    ],
    "records_created": [],
    "records_revised": [
      "catalog:cyberdelic-os:fn-14",
      "catalog:cyberdelic-os:fn-25"
    ],
    "records_removed": [],
    "decisions": [
      {
        "kind": "catalog-evidence-repair",
        "decision": "Replace each synthetic field-note label with the exact title fragment present in the cited source."
      },
      {
        "kind": "catalog-restraint",
        "decision": "Leave summaries, subjects, search terms, questions, and related paths unchanged because the source recheck supports them."
      },
      {
        "kind": "finite-search",
        "decision": "Keep directory results bounded to six and the default Library aperture at three works."
      }
    ],
    "search_terms_added": [],
    "outward_search_performed": false,
    "catalog_count": 15,
    "decision_reason": "The two records were findable but their evidence locators did not literally occur in the exact source. Repairing those locators improves auditability without expanding the catalog."
  },
  "files_changed": [
    "living-relations/proposals.json",
    "living-relations/catalog.json",
    "living-relations/audits/2026-09-17-001.json",
    "cyberdelic-space.zip"
  ],
  "validation": {
    "state": "passed",
    "checks": [
      {
        "check": "bounded-source-review",
        "result": "Primary Polis and Community Notes sources remain consistent with the three existing proposal descriptions. The exact Cyberdelic OS source supports all repaired local evidence locators without conflict."
      },
      {
        "check": "structured-data",
        "result": "All 43 JSON documents and three XML documents parsed successfully."
      },
      {
        "check": "exact-source-integrity",
        "result": "All 31 indexed Field, Workshop, and Library sources matched recorded byte lengths and SHA-256 values. The five repaired proposal and catalog locators, plus every evidence fragment on all seven manifest edges, occur in their cited exact sources."
      },
      {
        "check": "internal-links",
        "result": "All 2,871 local links and assets resolved across 138 HTML pages."
      },
      {
        "check": "application-and-data-contracts",
        "result": "All eight JavaScript files passed syntax checks. The 18 proposals, 15 catalog records, twelve relational nodes, seven edges, unique identifiers, required catalog fields, and finite limits passed contract checks."
      },
      {
        "check": "responsive-browser",
        "result": "Living Relationships and the homepage directory rendered at 390 by 844 pixels with the psychedelic default, accessible links and search, and no horizontal overflow; document width equalled viewport width."
      },
      {
        "check": "catalog-search",
        "result": "Homepage searches for open anatomy and boroughs returned the corresponding tended field notes within the six-result limit. The three-work default Library aperture remained unchanged."
      },
      {
        "check": "finite-attending",
        "result": "The current Attending arrangement remained exactly three items and no dated tending page was created for evidence-locator repairs."
      },
      {
        "check": "changed-prose-policy",
        "result": "No em dash characters were added."
      },
      {
        "check": "publication-boundary",
        "result": "Only proposal metadata, catalog metadata, the dated audit, and deterministic mirror changed. No exact publication, site page, application code, sitemap, ratification record, or human-locked control changed."
      },
      {
        "check": "distribution-archive",
        "result": "The deterministic mirror was rebuilt twice with identical SHA-256 output, includes the dated audit, and matches every archived source byte for byte."
      }
    ]
  },
  "unresolved_questions": [
    "Should future evidence audits prefer exact title fragments, exact body passages, or both when a relation rests on a whole field note?",
    "How should a public catalog expose source evidence without overwhelming the finite search surface?"
  ],
  "public_change": true,
  "proposed_public_change": true,
  "run_state": "evidence-locator-repair",
  "valid_no_op": false,
  "human_review_required": false,
  "note": "Three proposal locators and two catalog locators now point to literal exact-source text. No public tending page or Attending rotation was warranted because the relational field did not materially change."
}
